down under Section 16(2) and Section 18(5) , then the shareholder who received dividend would always receive a certificate under Section 20 . The difficulty ... that the assessees received the amounts representing dividends totalling Rs. 3,628. Section 16(2) states:
For the purposes of inclusion in the total income
Section 18(5) and Section 16(2) of the Act.
The question submitted to us is, whether in the absence of a certificate under Section ... down under Section 16(2) and Section 18(5) , then the shareholder who received dividend would always receive a certificate under Section 20 . The difficulty
property to the Company and, therefore, liable to be
prosecuted under Section 630 of the Act. This will include anyone else
who has been inducted ... GENERAL" and a few provisions therein, namely,
Sections 628 to 631 create offences and also
prescribe penalty for the same. Having regard
conviction under Section 143 , Indian Penal Code, or the intention of the accused in a conviction under Section 448 , Indian Penal Code: Subal Chunder ... Kanai Sanyasi (1897) I.L.R. 25 Cal. 628 Section 106 could not be applied after a conviction for defamation although the person defamed
operation and the said
section and Section 181(4) of Cr.P.C., 1973 are not pari materia and there
are material changes in both ... Section 182 (4) of Cr.P.C. 1973
refers to offences of criminal misappropriation or of criminal breach of trust.
Therefore, Section 403 and Section
also brought on record that a
complaint under Sections 628 and 629 of the Companies Act had been
filed before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
Downloaded on - 22/03/2019 03:54:05 :::
Judgment
apeal628.17 17
6
Sections 376(1) and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.
Hence ... 2019 03:54:05 :::
Judgment
apeal628.17 17
22
(corresponding to Section 313 of the 1973 Code)
may be usefully quoted
taxmann.com 126/52 GST 94
(SC)/[2015] 11 SCC 628. Section 34 of the Income-tax Act 1922
prescribed a duty on Income
conviction under Section 143 , Indian Penal Code, or the intention of the accused in a conviction under Section 448 , Indian Penal ... Code: Subal Chunder Dey v. Ram Kanai Sanyasi (1897) 25 Cal. 628. Section 106 could not be applied after a conviction for defamation although
Kindersley V.C. had in Thompson v. Waithman (3 Dr. 628) held the 14th section to be retrospective. The Exchequer Chamber, consisting of Erle ... Exchequer Chamber overruled Thompson v. Waithman (3 Dr. 628), they held the 1st section of the Act not to be retrospective, Williams, J., observed
