concurrent
jurisdiction will usually refuse to interfere by
issuance of a second injunction. There is no
established rule of exclusion which would deprive
a court ... injunction, while such refusal does not exclude
another coordinate court or judge from
jurisdiction, yet the granting of the injunction by a
second judge
appellants over the same and for permanent injunction restraining the appellants and the second respondent from interfering with the first respondent's peaceful possession ... schedule property from the appellants and the second respondent and for permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment
from sanctioning any building plan in favour of the second defendant as well for permanent injunction restraining the sixth defendant from registering any kind ... physical possession thereof, had handed over the same to the second defendant, the second defendant would have been in possession of the suit property
second plaintiff. The first plaintiff, being wife of the second
plaintiff is also enjoying the suit properties as absolute owners thereof.
The second plaintiff leased ... Munsif, Erode, against the
second plaintiff and another for permanent injunction restraining the
second plaintiff and another from interfering with the peaceful possession
and enjoyment
Judge on 5th January, 2015 and the writ
was filed thereafter. Secondly, injunction has been prayed for to
restrain private respondent
possession of the land in dispute and thus the second application for injunction was liable to be rejected.
8. The Additional District Judge, Court ... defendant no.9.
9. The trial court found that the second application for injunction was filed three years after the rejection of the first application
injunction restraining first defendant viz., the Stale Bank of India, from paying any monies under the suit guarantee and also an injunction restraining the second ... suit O.S.No. 2889 of 1981 for an injunction against the second respondent herein viz., the first defendant, not to make any payment under
Appellants
preferred an application under Section 17 of 1996 Act seeking interim
injunction restraining Pivotal from alienating and encumbering the subject
land in earlier arbitration ... that Appellants had not made out a case for grant of
injunction. Second application was filed on 14.08.2017 again seeking order
of status quo with
SECOND DEFENDANT'S CASE
6. The second defendant has filed a separate Suit in O.S. No.16 of
2010 seeking permanent injunction ... also entitled to
the relief of permanent injunction restraining the second defendant from
interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said portion
before the District Court, Tiruppur, for injunction
restraining the second respondent from supplying yarn to other companies
http://www.judis.nic.in
4
and after ... dated 01.07.2017
and for seeking injunction, in which the learned Principal District Judge,
Tirupur granted interim injunction restrained the second respondent from
carrying the business
