under a specified tender
notice issued by the latter. A second and
further injunction order was passed by the said
Court on 09.12.2010 by which ... under
instructions given to him prior to the
receipt of the second injunction order
by Sergi, which unfortunately was not
communicated
said suit, interim injunction was
granted on 09.12.2004 restraining the second
respondent – Deivathal not to alienate the suit
property. The said suit for specific performance ... pending, it is alleged that
in violation of the interim injunction dated
09.12.2004, the second respondent – Deivathal had
executed the sale deed dated
seeking an order of interim injunction restraining the first respondent from invoking the performance bank guarantee issued by the second respondent pending adjudication ... dispute raised and another seeking an order of interim injunction restraining the second respondent from making any payment under the performance bank guarantee in favour
filed O.S.No.1160 of 1997 for an injunction restraining the second respondent/second defendant not to alienate or encumber the suit property ... before City Civil Court, Chennai, for permanent injunction restraining the second respondent herein not to alienate or encumber the suit property. Even though the second
suit as well as the application for interim injunction.
6. The second respondent filed a counter contending that they are the largest independent supplier ... including the buyer of the appellant namely the second respondent. Therefore, if an injunction is granted, though under the guise of brand name being misused
said suit, interim injunction was
granted on 09.12.2004 restraining the second
respondent – Deivathal not to alienate the suit
property. The said suit for specific performance ... pending, it is alleged that
in violation of the interim injunction dated
09.12.2004, the second respondent – Deivathal had
executed the sale deed dated
been allowed in part by granting an order of interim injunction restraining the second defendant from alienating the eastern portion of the suit property. Application ... colluded together in order to harass the second respondent, for which, a complaint was given by the second respondent against the first defendant. The mere
applicant in the application. The second respondent was the second defendant in the suit and the second respondent in the application The first respondent/applicant ... property in entirety. The learned single Judge also granted interim injunction restraining the second respondent from alienating or encumbering or dealing with more than
Plaintiffs, the learned District Munsif granted temporary injunction.
6. As against the order of grant of temporary injunction, the Defendants have preferred the appeal ... trial Court finding that there cannot be an order of injunction against the second Defendant, who is entitled to half share. It was further held
injunction based on the averment that he is
in possession of the property and seeking assistance of the
Court while praying for permanent injunction restraining ... entitling him to grant of permanent
injunction.
16. The appellant-defendant decided to develop his property
through second respondent-builder and in that regard
