case of the respondents in both these second appeals is that the grant of mandatory injunction is in the discretion of the Court and taking ... relief of injunction end the relief : of injunction cannot be claimed as a substantive relief independently of the declaration sought.
10. The second category
declaration that the second item of 'C' Schedule property belonged
to the second plaintiff and for consequential injunction
(iii). declaration that the second ... property belonged
to the third plaintiff and for consequential injunction.
(iv). declaration that the second item of 'E' schedule property belonged
namely, (1) an injunction restraining the levy of contributions and audit fees under Act III of 1927 and (2) an injunction restraining the levy ... that Act on both the parties. With regard to the second injunction : the Supreme Court referred to the definition of a ' Math ' contained
second respondent. Therefore, the plaintiffs have right for an interim injunction against the second defendant also not to deal with the shares, pending disposal ... plaintiff and thus, the plaintiffs have right for an interim injunction against the second defendant also not to deal with the shares, pending disposal
second defendant and on 15.3.2001 the second defendant filed an application for registration of the trademark SVS in his favour. On 22.2.2001 the second defendant ... kind and Vanaspathi. Against the order granting interim injunction, the second defendant preferred an appeal
balance sale consideration. He also prayed for injunction restraining the second respondent herein from selling the suit property to the appellants or some other persons ... possession alleged by him and declined to grant the relief of injunction. The second respondent herein also denied the factum of possession given
order of injunction was vacated on 4.2.1985. A revision was filed by the second respondent herein ... have the execution proceedings restrained by an order of injunction. Inspite of that, the second respondent proceeded to file three applications as stated above
first respondent/first defendant; and 7) for costs.
2. Second respondent/second defendant remained ex parte before the trial Court. First and third defendants contested ... Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree for mandatory injunction and injunction as prayed for?
10. One witness was examined
Fast Track Court, the applicant moved an application for injunction in the second suit C.S.No.970 of 2010. In that application for injunction ... only after the applicant obtained an interim injunction in the second suit C.S.No.970 of 2010 on 02.12.2010, that his application before
said circular and this Court has granted interim injunction on 01.02.2011 and thereafter, the second respondent Management has withdrawn the said Circular dated 24.01.2011. After ... officers and when the workers went to Court and obtained injunction, the second respondent has withdrawn the circular and in respect of the workers
