refused us unnecessary. The plaintiff appealed against the refusal against the second injunction while the defendant crossed appeal asking for further limitation of the first ... goods as 'Wrights'. The Court of Appeal granted the second injunction but- did not limit the first injunction. It, therefore, allowed the appeal
doctor or a psychiatric was obtained.Certain other
aspects dealing with the second issue will be considered later on.
4. The first aspect ... Court order
cannot take away the said right.
(b) The injunction/sanction order has been passed without
opportunity to show cause and hearing
application is maintainable as there is no bar
to file second application for injunction incase the court is satisfied
about the fresh cause of action ... involved in the present case as to whether the second
application for the interim injunction is maintainable and if so, under
what circumstances. The Court
position of law, it has to be seen
whether the second application for interlocutory injunction in the
present case is barred on the general principle ... estoppel. The question raised in the present case by
this second application for interlocutory injunction is a pure question
of law and which admittedly
second plaintiff, called upon the second defendant by means of a notice to alter its corporate name by omitting the word Baker therefrom. The second ... present suit seeking, inter alia, (1) a decree of permanent injunction restraining the second defendant from using the word BAKER or any other word similar
concurrent jurisdiction will usually refuse to interfere by
issuance of a second injunction. There is no established rule
of exclusion which would deprive a court ... court or Judge from
jurisdiction, yet the granting of the injunction by a second
Judge may lead to compliance and retaliatory action
been worked, the court would, for the purpose of temporary
injunction, presume the patent to be valid one. If the patent is more
than ... itself
is not sufficient for the grant of an interlocutory injunction. Secondly,
IA 1234/2008 in CS(OS) 186/2008 Page
abuse of the process of law and that the second injunction application
filed was an abuse of the process of law.
8. That after ... second injunction application was
dismissed by the Appellate Court on 19.11.2001, the plaintiff, Sh.
Surat Singh, withdrew his suit on 16.09.2002 alleging that he came
restrain the enforcement of the bank guarantee by grant of interim injunction. Secondly, when there are 'special equities' necessitating the grant of injunction
objection to the present plaint is raised on the
ground that an injunction already stands granted in favour of the
plaintiff and against the defendants ... suit design, the written statement seeks
to submit that a second injunction cannot be sought by a separate suit
for yet another design which
