Court on the passing off action, wherein the application for injunction restraining the second respondent from using the impugned trade mark was dismissed. The appellant ... appeal and the Division Bench granted the injunction restraining the second respondent from using the trade mark. The second respondent moved the Supreme Court against
pass an order of permanent injunction against the second and third respondents from interfering with the management of the SMHPL and its Hotel Windsor ... file of the Sub Court at Ernakulam for permanent injunction restraining the second respondent and his agents from interfering with the management of the SMHPL
spite of an order of injunction dated November 6, 2002, obtained by the second respondent in C. S. No. 477 of 2000, on the file ... declaration and injunction that the second respondent and petitioner herein are not chairman and director of the company respectively. The civil court, while disposing
M/S Gail (India) Limited vs Petroleum & Natural Gas Regulatory ... on 7 July, 2021
granted, therefore, does not stand proved.
26. The second assumption for granting the ad interim injunction was that the increase in price has no nexus ... percentage of increase in the price of inputs. The second assumption for granting the injunction also does not stand proved at this stage for lack
Trinity Exporters wherein the duty demand of ADD was set
aside on second hand Injection Moulding Machine. Ld. A.R prayed
that after considering ... whether Anti Dumping Duty (ADD) is leviable on the used and
second hand injunction moulding machine imported / originated
from China. It is not disputed that
directors of the
Company are related to the second respondent. The second respondent had
filed a suit in collusion with the Company before the City ... injunction application was taken up for disposal and after hearing the
parties the City Civil Court dismissed the injunction application, upon which
the second respondent
directors of the company are related to the second respondent. The second respondent had filed a suit in collusion with the company before the City ... injunction application was taken up for disposal and after hearing the parties the City Civil Court dismissed the injunction application, upon which the second respondent
afresh.
By way of order dated August 25, 2010 ('Second Order of the Copyright
Board'), the Copyright Board determined the royalty rates ... Delhi High Court granted an injunction in favour of the opposite party
against the application of the Second Order of the Copyright Board
Bhadresh Kantilal Shah vs Magotteaux International And Ors. on 16 December, 1999
Equivalent citations: [2002
