first time, there
would have to be some explanation and secondly, the plaintiff would have to
show his bona fides, particularly because such claims ... First one is for incorporating the
relief of mandatory injunction. Second one is for incorporating new survey
number. Third one is for payment of court
permanent injunction in the previous suit for
the following reasons.
15
31) First, the cause of action to claim a relief of
permanent injunction ... action on which he has
claimed a relief of permanent injunction.
33) Second, the cause of action to claim
temporary/permanent injunction against the
defendants
permanent injunction in the previous suit for the following reasons. 31) First, the cause of action to claim a relief of permanent injunction ... action on which he has claimed a relief of permanent injunction.
33) Second, the cause of action to claim temporary/permanent injunction against the defendants
injunction limb and granted the mandatory injunction prayer also. The first
appellate court reversed the decree of the trial court with regard to
mandatory injunction ... appellant by holding that
the cause of action for mandatory injunction and permanent injunction prayers
can certainly be different and distinct.
27 Though substantial questions
injunction. The suit in O.S. No.1267 of 1996 has been laid by the respondent for the relief of permanent injunction.
3. Second appeals ... suit only for bare injunction, it is found that the suit laid by the respondent for bare injunction simpliciter is not maintainable, in the light
recovery of money and for permanent injunction. The second petitioner
was looking after the case. The second petitioner was affected with
jaundice ... suffered stroke and was bedridden for a period of two weeks.
The second petitioner being the only son had to attend to the first petitioner
Partap Singh
and another" (hereinafter referred to as "second suit") seeking injunction
restraining Partap Singh and Balkar Singh from causing any interference ... arrived at by the Lower
Appellate Court granting injunction in favour of the plaintiffs in second suit
is justified. However, the suit claiming declaration
first suit, was the plaintiff in the second
suit claimed injunction against the plaintiffs, in the first suit, arraying them
as defendants on the premise ... sustainable in the eyes of law, thus,
injunction in favour of the plaintiff in second suit and defendant no.2 in first
suit is fallacious
third floor of the suit
property and injunction. This suit shall be referred as "the
second suit" hereinafter.
Suit No.7442 ... Badami Devi as
PW1 in second suit and Anil Kumar as PW2 in the second suit
by way of evidence affidavits
third floor of the suit
property and injunction. This suit shall be referred as "the
second suit" hereinafter.
Suit No.7442 ... Badami Devi as
PW1 in second suit and Anil Kumar as PW2 in the second suit
by way of evidence affidavits
