suit, referred to supra.
4. In the suit, a second application seeking temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with ... lower appellate court concurred in partly allowing the second temporary injunction application moved by the plaintiff-respondent.
9. In my view, the finding arrived
claimed in para 24(a) of the injunction application filed below
Exh.5. Vide second part of the relief in para ... granted
relief, as prayed for, in second part of para 24(a) of the
injunction application Exh.5.
12. Now, coming to the submission that
submitted that in the said suit, the second
respondent had filed an Interlocutory Application seeking interim
injunction and the same was dismissed ... that as a counter blast, after dismissal of the interim
injunction application, the second respondent had lodged a false
complaint before the first respondent
afresh.
By way of order dated August 25, 2010 ('Second Order of the Copyright
Board'), the Copyright Board determined the royalty rates ... Delhi High Court granted an injunction in favour of the opposite party
against the application of the Second Order of the Copyright Board
stated that the contempt application was not maintainable as applicant had remedy of filing an application under Order 39 Rule ... further mentioned that in pending Second Appeal No.276 of 2001, Union of India had already preferred an application under Order 39 Rule
obtained ad
interim injunction in I.A.No.220 of 2012, which was later made
absolute on 16.07.2012.
(c) Thereafter, the second respondent filed ... permanent injunction etc. In the said
suit, the second respondent also filed an application for interim
injunction vide
interim injunction against the revision petitioner/first defendant and the second respondent/second defendant.
5.The trial Court had granted an ad-interim injunction ... passed an exparte interim injunction and ordered notice to the revision petitioner and the second respondent herein and the application was posted on 29.04.2008. Immediately
second defendant in the suit; to amend the plaint; for an order of injunction restraining the respondents in the application from in any manner dealing ... status quo order has been passed in the injunction application. Under Section 17 of the Registration Act, the transfer of the property takes place only
submitted that since the
second respondent and his parents attempted to dispossess the second
petitioner from the suit property, the second petitioner has filed ... wife (second petitioner) through a registered settlement deed
dated 27.08.2004. His further cases that the second petitioner herein got
interim injunction in her favour
endeavour to finally dispose of the application of injunction within the period of thirty days. Second is, the legal obligation that if for any valid ... said protective measure. Second is the statutory obligation cast on the Court to pass final orders on the application within the period of thirty days
