only on the ground that second application for
injunction is not maintainable when earlier his application for temporary
injunction was dismissed by the learned Civil ... that there is no statutory bar against filing of a
second temporary injunction application provided new facts have emerged
which will warrant issuance of temporary
consider the order passed in
the application for injunction preferred by the plaintiff in the
second suit being Special Civil Suit ... plaintiff and again, rejected the
application for injunction preferred by the plaintiff. It was
observed that second suit filed by the plaintiff
causing harassment and mental and physical agony to the aged first and
second petitioners. The respondents 1 and 2 are repeatedly attempting to
delay ... report filed by the Advocate Commissioner by seeking
a second interim injunction application that claims the 2 feet set back left
by the revision petitioners
Facts in one appeal
Sham Singh Court, one injunction and the * Suit for permanent injunction
Harike arising out of a relief sought ... from raising any
for permanent
and permanent construction and changing the
injunction, but
injunction. nature of the property from
which got
agricultural to residential.
transferred
second suit the appellant herein – original plaintiff
preferred the present application seeking leave of the court to
file additional documents. In the application ... date of filing of the
second suit and at the time when the application for interim
injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 was not fully
civil court had allowed the application for interlocutory injunction filed
by the second and third respondents. This order was challenged by the
appellant before ... Rajkot16 in
which an interlocutory order of injunction was passed on 8 February
2013 protecting the second respondent. It was in this backdrop that
entitled for an order of
temporary injunction during pendency of the suit and secondly,
whether the application for amendment of plaint ought to have been ... findings rendered by the two Courts
below, while rejecting the application for temporary injunction filed on
behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it is found that
Suit No.13 of
1998.
3 Ghanchiwad Meman Regular Civil Judge • Seeking • Application (Exhibit
Jamat throught its Civil Suit Senior Division, declaration that 77) seeking ... application application was
Adhiya rejected by order
(Exhibit 77) was
filed seeking dated 22.6.2001
4. Umarbhai
permission to
Abubakarbhai
amend the plaint • Second injunction
Tinwala
Suit No.13 of
1998.
3 Ghanchiwad Meman Regular Civil Judge • Seeking • Application (Exhibit
Jamat throught its Civil Suit Senior Division, declaration that 77) seeking ... application application was
Adhiya rejected by order
(Exhibit 77) was
filed seeking dated 22.6.2001
4. Umarbhai
permission to
Abubakarbhai
amend the plaint • Second injunction
Tinwala
file of the second respondent pending disposal of the suit.
PRAYER IN O.A.NO.645 OF 2019: This Application is filed under
Order ... dated 05.07.2019 in
the interim Application filed in each suit, an order of injunction was
granted restraining FOSFA, the second Respondent, from proceeding
with
