Application in O.A.No.1102 of 2019 had been filed by the
appellant/plaintiff, seeking interim injunction (stated supra).
8. On notice, the second ... joinder of parties. Accordingly, the second respondent
sought for dismissal of the application for interim injunction.
9. The third respondent, who is the Director
sought for making the interim order of injunction as absolute.
12.Application No.6795 of 2014 (application for rejection of the plaint filed ... defendant):- The sum and substance of the application filed by the second defendant to reject the plaint are as follows:- The second defendant
plaintiff has filed an application in O.A.Nos.657 of 2013 for interim injunction restraining the second defendant, its officers, men and agents from ... application is very limited, since the application in A.No.657 of 2013 was filed only for interim injunction restraining the second respondent bank from
file a suit as against the second defendant. In the affidavit filed in support of the said application, the plaintiff has stated as follows ... filed an application in A.No.2870 of 2013 seeking leave of this Court to file a suit as against the second defendant
Benefit Fund Ltd., was invalid and for injunction restraining the second defendant
from confirming the sale. In such a situation, in the said ... Along with the present suit, the plaintiff also filed
an application for interim injunction in O.A.No.702 of 2005 restraining the defendants
also filed an application in A. No. 1845 of 2020 to vacate the interim injunction
granted ... application for vacating the interim injunction, it was contended
by the second defendant that even before the agreement dated 28.05.2020 was
entered into between
sanctions in the Coimbatore proceeding for her ongoing violation of
the Indian injunction. Thank you." Shockingly, the response received from the
respondent-wife ... second week of September 2019, she had not
filed counter statement till date, either in the main application or in the anti-
suit injunction application
rent payable in respect of the portions of the
second appellant;
(iv) interim injunction restraining the first
respondent-Company from interfering with the
appellants ... second, third,
fourth, fifth and half of the tenth floor of the building "Menon Eternity" and for
mandatory injunction directing the Sub-Registrar
rent payable in respect of the portions of the
second appellant;
(iv) interim injunction restraining the first
respondent-Company from interfering with the
appellants ... second, third,
fourth, fifth and half of the tenth floor of the building "Menon Eternity" and for
mandatory injunction directing the Sub-Registrar
applicability', 'utility' and resulting in 'economic advantage. The second respondent, considering the above novel invention of the petitioners, had granted ... obtained interim injunction against the petitioners.
9. It is mainly contended by the first respondent in the application seeking revocation of the Patent granted
