there being no said change, it was urged, the second application
for injunction would not be maintainable.
15. It is a trite law that ... application for amendment is considered. This Court, therefore, did not
grant any liberty to the plaintiffs to file a fresh application for injunction. It
could
endorsed on the reverse side of the
Agreement by the Second Respondent. However, the Second
Respondent failed to execute the registered Sale Deed inspite ... seeking an injunction restraining the second respondent from alienating
the schedule properties and this application was granted on 17.2.2000.
This petition was also transferred
will, a contempt application was also filed.
5. The learned trial Judge refused to pass an interim order of injunction where against an appeal being ... they filed their application for injunction after 12 years from the date of sale of the property and second application was filed after 4 years
appointment of Receiver and another for temporary injunction. The application for temporary injunction was allowed but application for appointment of Receiver was dismissed ... alleged in the application. We have gone through the second application for appointment of Receiver. In the said application also the respondent No.1 disclosed
application for injunction on 17th February 1995. In response to
the notice issued in this behalf on the said application, the second
respondent stated ... said application
was
rejected, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioners themselves should
file the said application. Thereafter, the petitioners filed an application
under
grant a judgment and decree of a
permanent injunction restraining the first and second
defendants either by themselves or through anyone on
their behalf from ... grant of a decree for permanent injunction but has also
asked for passing a decree for mandatory injunction directing the
respondents to handover possession
workmen and it was representing the concerned workmen before the Tribunal. An application was filed by the appellant herein for being represented by a legal ... Court, Second Bench, Calcutta by Sri Prosad Mukherjee against Shri A.D. Singh & Others. In the said suit an interim order of injunction
Block No. B of second floor of the plaint schedule construction. In other words, there will be an injunction restraining the defendants ... second floor of the complex pending disposal of the suit. In all other respects, the injunction is vacated.
If the party-in-person
petitioner was in possession of the second
floor of the property and he granted a temporary injunction restraining the
appellants from interfering with the possession ... husband. Hence, he allowed
the appeal and dismissed the temporary injunction application.
Aggrieved, Smt. Taruna Batra filed a petition under Article 227 of the
Constitution
Union Of India vs Pramod Gupta (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 7 September, 2005