attorney in
favour of second defendant, renewal agreement is said
to have been entered into by the plaintiffs with second
defendant and rent has been ... declaration and not in a suit for injunction
simplicitor. Said application came to be resisted by
second defendant by filing statement of objections,
contending interalia
Bengaluru. The
appellant and the second respondent are defendants 1 and 2
respectively. The said suit is for permanent injunction to
restrain the defendants from ... management affairs and administration of
the plaintiff company. In the second application for
temporary injunction, the plaintiff sought restrainment of
the defendants from representing
Court
rejecting the two interim applications filed by the appellants
for temporary injunction against the respondents from
changing the nature and from alienating and creating ... over the Suit
Schedule Property and the second application (IA No.9) on
11
16.10.2015 for temporary injunction only against certain
defendants/ respondents
first respondent against
the second respondent for the relief of permanent
injunction. In the said proceedings, an application filed
by the petitioner herein under Order ... Section 151 of CPC seeking to get himself
impleaded as second defendant is rejected by order
dated 25.11.2017 which is impugned in this proceeding
submits that the trial
Court could not have allowed the application filed by the
second respondent herein to come on record as plaintiff ... wife, application under
Order I Rule 10 of CPC to come on record as second
respondent by the father who is the second respondent
herein
acquired by the second defendant from her
own income. All the documents stand in her name. The impugned
order shows non-application of the mind ... taken into consideration at the time of
deciding the application for temporary injunction. According to
him, the trial court has properly exercised discretion for granting
second defendant in respect of the suit schedule
property is not binding on them and for permanent and
mandatory injunction. The plaintiffs filed application under ... first defendant in favour of the second
defendant is not binding on the plaintiffs and for mandatory
injunction. It is the specific case
rejected the said application. The said order
was not challenged at the relevant point of time.
Thereafter the petitioner filed second application under
Order ... rejected the application
on the ground that as a similar application already filed
was disposed of on 06.11.2015, the second application is
not maintainable. Hence
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The respondents filed a suit for injunction. The
interim application filed for temporary injunction was
allowed. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants preferred ... application on three grounds - firstly, that the order
passed by the Trial Court is not executable; secondly, that
grant of temporary injunction is a discretionary
dated 25-01-
2016 allowed the application and permitted the second
respondent herein to come on record as second plaintiff.
4. Heard the learned counsel ... Since August 2004, till the filing of present application to
come on record as second plaintiff, the fact of execution of gift
deed
