prayers made in the second injunction application already found
place in the first injunction application. The second injunction
application was, in fact, prompted ... Hence, even without the second injunction application, the prayers of
the first injunction application would cover that of the second and the
learned Trial Judge
prayers made in the second injunction application already found
place in the first injunction application. The second injunction
application was, in fact, prompted ... Hence, even without the second injunction application, the prayers of
the first injunction application would cover that of the second and the
learned Trial Judge
construction having not been completed within the stipulated
period, the second injunction application was filed.
10. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the
defendant ... passing
the second impugned order which comprises of a deemed refusal of
the prayer made in the second injunction application at the ad
interim stage
construction having not been completed within the stipulated
period, the second injunction application was filed.
10. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the
defendant ... passing
the second impugned order which comprises of a deemed refusal of
the prayer made in the second injunction application at the ad
interim stage
construction having not been completed within the stipulated
period, the second injunction application was filed.
10. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the
defendant ... passing
the second impugned order which comprises of a deemed refusal of
the prayer made in the second injunction application at the ad
interim stage
construction having not been completed within the stipulated
period, the second injunction application was filed.
10. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the
defendant ... passing
the second impugned order which comprises of a deemed refusal of
the prayer made in the second injunction application at the ad
interim stage
amendment application.
7. It is pointed out from an order dated May 30, 2010, by which the trial court
rejected an application for injunction filed ... present revisional application
are:
9
(i) Whether the amendments sought to be introduced by the second
amendment application were barred by the proviso to Order
that the averments and
contentions of the injunction application which state that defendant
first party and defendant second party had no right, title and interest ... plaint
as well as the injunction application that the right, title, interest and
possession of the defendant first and second parties have been
that the averments and
contentions of the injunction application which state that defendant
first party and defendant second party had no right, title and interest ... plaint
as well as the injunction application that the right, title, interest and
possession of the defendant first and second parties have been
such issue at the time of final disposal of the temporary
injunction application as well as at further stages of the suit.
15. However, such ... secondly, to file
an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code and
thirdly, to contest the injunction application on merits by filing
