Dr Shivakumar Am vs M/O Labour &Amp Employment on 24 January, 2020
1
afresh.
By way of order dated August 25, 2010 ('Second Order of the Copyright
Board'), the Copyright Board determined the royalty rates ... Delhi High Court granted an injunction in favour of the opposite party
against the application of the Second Order of the Copyright Board
injunction
application in the first instance in the appellant's favour, had erred in rejecting
the application made by the appellant the second time ... allowed, the impugned Order was set aside, in
consequence, the injunction application submitted by the appellant under
Section 9 of the Arbitration Act was allowed
Miglani for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant filed an application No.522509 in class ... High Court on the passing off action, wherein the application for injunction restraining the second respondent from using the impugned trade mark was dismissed
injunction application in the first instance
in the appellant's favour, had erred in rejecting the application made by the
appellant the second time ... allowed, the impugned Order was set aside, in consequence, the injunction
application submitted by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act
was allowed
Dr Mahaboob Basha Sk vs M/O Labour &Amp Employment on 24 January, 2020
Tejomani M vs E.S.I.C on 24 January, 2020
1 OA No. 170
Charusheela Y Ankushkar vs E.S.I.C on 24 January, 2020
1 OA No
Divyashree R N vs E.S.I.C on 24 January, 2020
1 OA No
Dr Raghavendra B vs M/O Labour &Amp Employment on 24 January, 2020
1