interim
injunction and the present application is maintainable as there is no bar
to file second application for injunction incase the court is satisfied
about ... deciding the first application. Therefore, in
that context, the Court considered the second application filed by the
plaintiffs for interim injunction.
I.A. No.9770
application of appellant under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC has observed as:
"Alongwith this suit, plaintiff has filed another application
under Order ... Prakash Tripathi Contd....P...5 of 6
: 6 :
11 Thus, the second injunction application of the appellant dated
05.07.2011 has been dismissed vide impugned order
loss if an injunction is continued or made absolute and therefore, the injunction has to be vacated and the application for injunction ... Delhi High Court. In the said suit, an application for injunction filed by the second defendant as applicant the right of the second defendant
such application before the second respondent.
5. In the meanwhile, respondent No.3 instituted
the suit in O.S.No.5275/2011 for injunction alleging ... matter in question is considered by the
second respondent, after dismissal of the application
for temporary injunction by the Civil Court
damages, it was not open to
the second respondent again to move an application for temporary injunction to
restrain the appellants from alienating the property ... specific performance, but
its award is under challenge in the application filed by the second respondent
under Section 34 of the Act and that
Union Of India vs Videocon Industries Ltd. on 5 March, 2012
Author: Reva Khetrapal
Bench
second defendant in suit filed
an application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC . The second petitioner in OP as
plaintiff filed an application under Order ... petitioner/second defendant and fourth respondent/third defendant
in this petition have vehemently contended that the Second respondent/Second
plaintiff has got no locus standi
both the applicants and the second respondent for and against the maintainability of the suit and the injunction application, submitted the following authorities ... learned counsel for the second respondent, the second application filed for the same relief, after getting the first application dismissed as withdrawn, is barred
Principal Sub Court, Chingleput for partition and permanent injunction. The second defendant filed an application to permit him to pay the stamp duty
Shri Sohan Lal and for recovery of possession thereof;
and Second, for perpetual injunction that the defendant No. 1 should
not interfere with his right ... Devasthan by filing a fresh application. Accordingly,
Jagdish Lal did file an application; and the proceedings in this
application led to an order dated
