which execution was Said to have remained further stayed under a second injunction. There can be no question that if any of those periods could ... extended up to the 18th January, 1944; and that of the second injunction extended from the 13th February, 1947 up to the 17th February
case of the respondents in both these second appeals is that the grant of mandatory injunction is in the discretion of the Court and taking ... relief of injunction end the relief : of injunction cannot be claimed as a substantive relief independently of the declaration sought.
10. The second category
Fast Track Court, the applicant moved an application for injunction in the second suit C.S.No.970 of 2010. In that application for injunction ... only after the applicant obtained an interim injunction in the second suit C.S.No.970 of 2010 on 02.12.2010, that his application before
favour in the office of the Sub Registrar, Namakkal.
(vii) The second petitioner / second defendant alongwith his son Gurumurthy and his sister Nallammal filed suit ... been obtained by fraud and also prayed for permanent injunction.
(viii) the second petitioner also along with others filed
sought to be
executed was the part of the decree granting
prohibitory injunction, or so to say a breach thereof,
which would be governed ... Firstly other
prayers were also there apart from prayer of
mandatory injunction. Secondly, even in the prayer
of mandatory injunction in the plaint
wherein two suits were filed; the first one for permanent
injunction and the second for specific performance of an agreement. The
issue whether the second ... action on which he has claimed a relief of
permanent injunction.
29.2. Second, the cause of action to claim
temporary/permanent injunction against the defendants
second defendant continuously from 20.1.1954 and for consequential mandatory injunction directing the second defendant to cancel the entries dated 13.8.1971 and 13.11.1971 made ... maintainable and that the further prayer for consequential mandatory injunction directing the second defendant to cancel the entries dated 13.8.1971 and 13.11.1971 at page
defendant continuously from 20th January, 1954 and for consequential mandatory injunction directing the second defendant to cancel the entries dated 13th November, 1971 and 13th ... maintainable and that the further prayer for consequential mandatory injunction directing the second defendant to cancel the entries dated 13th August, 1971 and 13th November
respondent as plaintiff filed O.S.No.150/2004 for mandatory
injunction against the revision petitioners/defendants for removing the
alleged encroachment in the suit ... executing the decree for
recovery of possession and not for mandatory injunction. Secondly, the
decree for removing the encroachment contains only the width
defendant is illegal and for the
consequential relief of mandatory injunction directing the second
defendant to cease and desist from acting as the mathadhipathi ... management of the first defendant, and
consequential relief of mandatory injunction directing the second
defendant to handover the assets, effects, properties and affairs
