power exists under the CrPC . Even Section 102 of the CrPC is not analogous to Section 132(3) . Section ... CrPC is akin to second proviso to 132(1). The CrPC has no provision equivalent to Section 132(3) . Section
reading of the
complaint discloses cognizable offence under Section 154 of
Cr.P.C., registration of FIR is mandatory as per the dicta laid
down ... Crl. LJ 3329 and
contends that even subsequent complaints, if received by
Station House Office, it would be a statement under Section 162
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as one of the classes of Criminal Courts, and Section 20 of the Cr.P.C. lays down the categorization ... Executive Magistrates. Sections 20 to 23 of the Cr.P.C. read as under:
20. Executive Magistrates. (1) In every district and in every metropolitan
substantiate the same. He made a confessional statement Under Section 164 Cr.PC before the 1st Class Judicial Magistrate on 20th March, 1997 at Dhanbad ... those involved in the criminal conspiracy be criminally prosecuted for having indulged into a criminal act under the Indian Penal Code .
(1) That according
PMLA, 2002 states that the
provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code , 1973 ( CrPC ) shall apply in so
far as they are not inconsistent ... recorded by the ED do not have the procedural safeguards that exist under
the CrPC when the statement is recorded before a Magistrate
Aman Choudhary vs Union Of India on 30 May, 2023
Item No. 3 (Court No
Supreme Court that a statement under Section 164 of Code of Criminal
Procedure is not a substantive piece of evidence. It can be used only ... Supreme Court reiterated that a statement given under Section 164
13
of Cr.PC was not a substantive piece of evidence and can be utilized
means it can be said that provisions of Section 319 Cr.P.C. cannot
be pressed into service during the course of 'inquiry ... charges, the
trial commences, and therefore, the power under Section
319(1) Cr.P.C.
.P.C. can be exercised at any time after
Supreme
Court that a statement under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure
is not a substantive piece of evidence. It can be used only ... Supreme Court reiterated that a statement given under Section
164 of Cr.PC was not a substantive piece of evidence and can be utilized
only
carefully
looked into. It is true that in Section 164 Cr.PC statement of Abdul
SEBASTIAN ANTONY ... Supreme
Court that a statement under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure
is not a substantive piece of evidence. It can be used only
