Hazari Courts vs Union Of India Bearing on 4 November, 2011
22 (1982) DLT 458 SC.
8. The present petition has been filed u/s 14 (1 ) (e) r/w section 25 B of
DRC Act
Search Results Page
Search Results
81 - 90 of 541 (0.93 seconds)Sh. Sheetal Parshad Jain vs Sh. Harsh Sabharwal on 21 January, 2011
Cases 365.
22. The present petition has been filed u/s 14 (1 ) (e) r/w section 25 B of
DRC Act and in order
Sh. Yashpal Singh vs Sh. Rakesh Kumar @ Raju on 23 July, 2011
petition are also seeking
eviction of the respondent u/s 14 (1) (g) of DRC Act in which the
premises are required bona fide ... made in the
petition, the grounds of eviction u/s 14 (1) (f) of DRC Act has become
redundant and same has also been fairly
Sh. Rao Tej Pal vs Sh. Uma Kant on 4 November, 2011
that respondent no. 1 has already filed a petition u/s 45 of
DRC Act for restoration of user of latrine, common covered verandah ... 22. The court of Sh. Amit Kumar, the then Ld. ARC Delhi vide order dated
24.09.2007 dismissed the application u/s 45 (3) of DRC
Dr. Sunil Abrol vs Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta on 23 May, 2011
petitioner had earlier filed an eviction
petition u/s 14 (1) (a) , (b) and (j) of DRC Act purported to have been filed ... counter affidavit that said petition u/s 14 (1) (a), (b) and (j) of DRC Act
was filed by father of the petitioner late
Smt. Phool Wati vs Sh. Ramesh Chand on 27 July, 2011
defendants right to protection under DRC Act is extinguished. Thereafter,
no new tenancy is created in favour of defendant.
22. The counsel for defendants also ... Explanation II of section 2 (l)
was left open.
23. One more question arises here. Section 50 of DRC Act provides that no
civil court
Sh. Ram Kishore S/O Late Sh. Raghubar ... vs Sh. Radha Kishan S/O Late Sh. Raghubar ... on 10 June, 2011
brothers i.e. the
CS no:144/09 Page No: 2/22
defendants no.1 & 2 became the co-owner and co-landlord ... 22
remain in possession of the suit property during her lifetime under the
provisions of section 2(l) of the DRC Act and no other
Harish Talwar vs Rani Gadhoke (Deceased) Represented By on 20 October, 2011
landlord.
22. A lot of argument was generated on the basis of the defence
with which the earlier proceedings under Section 21 DRC Act
respecting
Smt. Anita Raghav vs Dr. Dinesh Vashisht on 23 February, 2011
required to deposit the rent in the court u/s 27 of DRC Act. It has been
held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court ... legal notice dated 22.11.2004 EX.
PW1/5 u/s 27 of DRC Act. A question was put to the respondent in his
crossexamination
Sh. H.L.Srivastava vs Sh. Vijay Kumar on 17 October, 2011
22. In view of the above discussions as all the ingredients of section
14 (1) (e) of DRC Act are proved therefore