NAVIN
DALMIA
3 RUBAMIN SPRL DRC(CONGO) 100% BY RFZC NA
4 RUBACO SPRL DRC (CONGO) 100% BY RFZC NA
8. The above group ... LIMITED
There was a search conducted on the assessee under section 132 of the Act dated
26th April 2013. As a result of search various
regular return of income u/s. 143(1)
of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act') was filed by the
appellant ... filed an application in Form No. 34BC before the
DRC u/s. 245MA of the Act. The said committee not admitted the
application on the ground
information. Therefore, details of
information cannot be provided under section 8(1) of RTI Act, 2005.
12. Certified copy of summon issued from this office ... information. Therefore, details of
information cannot be provided under section 8(1) of RTI Act, 2005.
12. Certified copy of summon issued from this office
2024 (old OA no. 106/2012)
section 19(1) of RDDBFI Act, 1993 on 04.06.2012 against 6 defendants, that is,
Anandram Developers (Principal Borrower), Manoharamma ... 2016 on
06.11.2015 before DRT-I, Chennai under section 19(1) of RDDBFI Act, 1993 for
recovery of a sum of ₹56.50 crore 19.10.2015, together
held that the payment made through DRC-03 is
not permissible under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944.
5. Heard both sides and perused ... following cases
had held that the payment made through DRC-03 is not permissible under
Section 35F.
Tina Rubber & Infrastructure Limited vs. Commissioner
Member (J)
In the present Original Application filed under
Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985,
the applicant seeks the following reliefs ... aside the Impugned Order
DE.4(77)/DRC/E-IV/Part File (40/22) DST/2024/133-138
dated 07.01.2025 vide which the Respondents have
File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/001054
Right to Information Act 2005Under Section (19)
Date of hearing : 17th August 2016
Date of decision : 17th ... information on the remaining points under section 8 (1) (d) , (e)
& (j) of the RTI act.
Grounds of the First Appeal
Not satisfied with
BIFR and the Presiding Officer, DRT-I, has to also cancelled the DRC.
3. On a perusal of the order, it is seen that ... Court keeping in view the provisions under Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Company (Special Provisions) Act, and the order dated 21.11.2000 decreeing
Bonani Kakkar vs Oil India Limited on 19 February, 2021
Author: Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
that the assessee did not possess any transferable right in the property.
22. Next it was argued that the statutory tenancy is not transferable ... read along with Expln. I, II and III of the DRC Act. It was explained that the statutory tenant has limited right in the property