they had vacated the office of directors in terms of Section 283(1)(g) of the Act. The Reserve Bank of India ... reportedly ceased to be in office in terms of Section 283(1)(g) .
5. In regard to the EGM in which the resolution in terms
Section 260 and removal under Section 284 of the Act whereas the petitioner vacated office under the provisions of Section 283(1)(g ... Petitioner 1 pleaded that the Respondents could not have treated him as ceased to be a director in terms of Section 283(1) (g
board of directors and had thus incurred a disqualification under Section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act. Some shareholders of the company had given ... Section 299 of the Companies Act;
6. The eighth defendant, Dr. Aravinda Babu, had incurred a disqualification under Section 283(1)(g) and vacated office
also informed that they have vacated office in terms of Section 283(1)(g) of the said Act.
6. Permission was granted ... 1. Since we have held that the stand of the company that the petitioner directors had vacated office under Section 283(1)(g) cannot
have vacated the office of director in terms of Section 283(1)(g) of the Act. He submitted that the respondents have not given ... director with effect from May 4, 1998, in terms of Section 283(1)(g) on May 4, 1998. During arguments, counsel for the respondents, referring
voluntarily and freely passed the resolution and executed the agreement; Section 283(1)(g) provides that a director shall cease to hold office ... appellants and respondents Nos. 1 to 5 were made permanent directors ; but Section 283(1)(g) applies to permanent directors also and this provision
declaring that the plaintiff has not incurred any disqualification under section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, thereby vacating the office of the director ... attending three consecutive board meetings as per the provisions of section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act and also in terms of article
consecutive board meetings, and did not attract the disqualification under Section 283(1)(g) of the Act. The second respondeni played the same trick ... office of director by B. Jaganmohan Rao by virtue of Section 283(1)(g) was recorded. This has not been objected to by the petitioner
nominees were removed from the Board of the company under Section 283(1)(g) on 30.1.2003. Hence, this petition under Sections ... share issues; introduction of 48 new members and removals under Sections 283 (1)(g) , etc indulged by Respondent No. 2 during December, 2002 and January
removal/vacation of office as director of the company under Section 283(1)(g) of the Act; illegal allotment of 70,000 equity shares ... been held that in case of disqualification under Section 283(1)(g) , the onus of proving despatch of notices and its receipt by the director
