they had vacated the office of directors in terms of Section 283(1)(g) of the Act. The Reserve Bank of India ... reportedly ceased to be in office in terms of Section 283(1)(g) .
5. In regard to the EGM in which the resolution in terms
Section 260 and removal under Section 284 of the Act whereas the petitioner vacated office under the provisions of Section 283(1)(g ... Petitioner 1 pleaded that the Respondents could not have treated him as ceased to be a director in terms of Section 283(1) (g
have vacated the office of director in terms of Section 283(1)(g) of the Act. He submitted that the respondents have not given ... director with effect from May 4, 1998, in terms of Section 283(1)(g) on May 4, 1998. During arguments, counsel for the respondents, referring
consecutive board meetings, and did not attract the disqualification under Section 283(1)(g) of the Act. The second respondeni played the same trick ... office of director by B. Jaganmohan Rao by virtue of Section 283(1)(g) was recorded. This has not been objected to by the petitioner
nominees were removed from the Board of the company under Section 283(1)(g) on 30.1.2003. Hence, this petition under Sections ... share issues; introduction of 48 new members and removals under Sections 283 (1)(g) , etc indulged by Respondent No. 2 during December, 2002 and January
removal/vacation of office as director of the company under Section 283(1)(g) of the Act; illegal allotment of 70,000 equity shares ... been held that in case of disqualification under Section 283(1)(g) , the onus of proving despatch of notices and its receipt by the director
called cessation of the directorship of petitioner No. 1 under the provisions of Section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956 and declaring ... vacation of office as Director by the petitioner No. 1 under Section 283(1)(g) without giving proper notice for the board meetings has also
were
removed from the Office of Director in accordance with Section 283(1)(g) of
the old Act. However, Appellant No.3 filed Form ... were removed as Directors on 18.05.2011 in accordance with Section
283(1)(g) of the old Act for not attending 3 consecutive Board Meetings
stated that the 3rd respondent had vacated the office under Section
283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956 as he did not attend more ... required to be given to that particular director against whom Section
283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956 is being invoked and the said
Board, thereby vacating the office as directors under Section 283(1)(g) of the Act. In this connection, Shri Mylsamy drew our attention ... petitioners 1 & 2 could not have ceased to be directors of the Company by virtue of Section 283(1)(g) . The petitioners never received
