Naresh Agarsinh Chhara @ Nariyo vs State Of Gujarat on 20 April, 2018
Author: Harsha Devani
2013 for
the offence punishable under Sections 409 and 420 read
with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the
present petitioner ... punishable under Sections 409 and 420 read with
Section 34 of IPC, the bar provided under Section
111(2) and 111
Fir No.248/11 PsNew Usmanpur State vs . Naeem Khan & Ors. Page No
Bench of
this Court to the said penal provision, that is, Section 377 of the
Indian Penal Code, in Suresh Kumar Koushal and another ... Constitution of India and further to declare Section 377 of
the Indian Penal Code (for short, ― IPC ‖) to be unconstitutional. When
the said
The Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
HARYANA
India
The Haryana Goods and Services
registered for offences under
Sections 285 and 506 I.P.C., read with under Section 27 and u/s 30 of
the Arms Act. During ... offence under Section 285 I.P.C. as alleged
2
in F.I.R. is not made out and Section 307
registered for offences under Sections 285
and 506 I.P.C., read with under Section 27 and u/s 30 of the Arms Act. During ... offence under Section 285 I.P.C. as alleged in F.I.R. is not made out and Section
307 I.P.C. was added
arising out of Case Crime No.111/2009 under Sections 376 , 504 , 506 I.P.C. and Section 3 (1) (12) SC/ST (Prevention ... important which reads as under :-
"Commits any offence under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) punishable with imprisonment for a term
Indian Penal Code, 1860
(hereinafter referred to as the " IPC ") and under
section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951
(hereinafter ... under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and
Page 4 of 26
R/CR.A/111/2015 JUDGMENT
Section 135 of the Bombay Police
IPC in FIR No.111
dated 20.09.2016 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police
Station Sadar Jalalabad ... dispute in respect to which FIR
No.111 dated 20.09.2016 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC was
registered at Police Station City