Section 13 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
13. Challenge procedure.
(1) Subject to sub-section (4), the parties are free to agree
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 65048 (6.05 seconds)Section 13 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Arbitration Act, 1940
13. Powers of arbitrator .-The arbitrators or umpire shall, unless a different intention is expressed in the agreement
Sindhu Suresh Gowda vs M/S. India Infoline Finance Limited on 15 December, 2022
though obligated under
the provisions of sub- section 3 of section 13
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996
to decide the challenge ... Arbitrator has not complied the
mandatory provision of section 13 of sub-
section 3 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
has given a complete
Mr. Krishnabhagwan Rajaram Sharma, ... vs M/S. Tata Motors Finance Ltd on 4 March, 2015
16th June, 2012 the petitioner filed an application under section 13(2) of
the Arbitration Act through his advocate Mr.M.L.Chaturvedi inter alia ... order passed by
the learned arbitrator under section 13(2) nor under section 17 of the Arbitration
Act. The petitioner thus cannot be allowed
National Thermal Power Corporation vs . Meghalaya Power Distribution on 6 July, 2021
Section 8 , Section 13
(1A) of the Commercial Courts, Act, 2015 read with Section 37 (1)(b) of
the Arbitration Act. To substantiate this contention ... refers parties to
arbitration under Section 8 , not being appealable
under Section 37(1)(a) , would not be appealable
under Section 13
Krishnabhagwan Rajaram Sharma Prop Of ... vs M/S Tata Motors Finance Ltd on 4 March, 2015
16th June, 2012 the petitioner filed an application under section 13(2) of
the Arbitration Act through his advocate Mr.M.L.Chaturvedi inter alia ... order passed by
the learned arbitrator under section 13(2) nor under section 17 of the Arbitration
Act. The petitioner thus cannot be allowed
Krishnabhagwan Rajaram Sharma vs M/S. Tata Motors Finance Ltd on 4 March, 2015
16th June, 2012 the petitioner filed an application under section 13(2) of
the Arbitration Act through his advocate Mr.M.L.Chaturvedi inter alia ... order passed by
the learned arbitrator under section 13(2) nor under section 17 of the Arbitration
Act. The petitioner thus cannot be allowed
Mr. Krishnabhagwan Rajaram Sharma vs M/S. Tata Motors Finance Ltd on 4 March, 2015
16th June, 2012 the petitioner filed an application under section 13(2) of
the Arbitration Act through his advocate Mr.M.L.Chaturvedi inter alia ... order passed by
the learned arbitrator under section 13(2) nor under section 17 of the Arbitration
Act. The petitioner thus cannot be allowed
Krishnabhagwan Rajaram Sharma vs M/S. Tata Motors Finance Ltd on 4 March, 2015
16th June, 2012 the petitioner filed an application under section 13(2) of
the Arbitration Act through his advocate Mr.M.L.Chaturvedi inter alia ... order passed by
the learned arbitrator under section 13(2) nor under section 17 of the Arbitration
Act. The petitioner thus cannot be allowed
Mr. Krishnabhagwan Rajaram Sharma vs M/S. Tata Motors Finance Ltd on 4 March, 2015
16th June, 2012 the petitioner filed an application under section 13(2) of
the Arbitration Act through his advocate Mr.M.L.Chaturvedi inter alia ... order passed by
the learned arbitrator under section 13(2) nor under section 17 of the Arbitration
Act. The petitioner thus cannot be allowed