Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 829 (2.13 seconds)

State vs Aalam on 21 July, 2015

statement made by accused person to police official was hit by Section 162 Cr.P.C. and therefore, such statement given to decoy police constable ... wrongly assumed that the statement of prosecution witnesses are hit by Section 162 Cr.P.C. 11. The counsels for the respondents supported the impugned
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anil Kumar vs State on 29 May, 2015

Inspector was inadmissible as it was hit by Section 162 , Criminal Procedure Code. He relied on a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court ... 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code. What is excluded by Section 162 , Criminal Procedure Code is the statement made to a Police Officer
Delhi High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S Khanna - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next