transferred by him under sub-section (2) of section 15 or sub-section (5)
of section 17 or in the payment of any charges payable ... amounts due from any employer”
is found in Section 7A as well as in Section 17B is not factually correct.
Section 17B speaks of “contributions
proceedings instituted under Section 33C(2)
of the I.D. Act cannot be considered as the scheme of Section 17B does
not envisage such ... misconceived, having regard to the fact that Section 33C(2) stands on a different
footing from Section 17B . While under Section 17B it is under
whether the High Court was justified in interpreting the provisions of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act (for short the Act) in the matter ... such would be entitled to the benefits flowing from Section 17B of the Act, the High Court granted that relief but restricted
CWJC No.2406 of 1979(R). The workmen claimed relief under Section 17B of the I.D. Act in that CWJC. On April ... order passed by the learned Single Judge in terms of Section 17B of the I.D. Act, the Letters Patent Appeal was not maintainable because
writ petition filed by the present appellants and their application under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act should be disposed of together, expeditiously ... view that an application under Section 17B should be disposed of before the principal petition and it should be disposed of most expeditiously
rejected" the Appellant's application dated 14.6.1999 under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Annexure-P/5 at page ... pending Writ Petition by the Respondent-Bank order under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was required to be passed. It is true
Court till 12.07.2013,
therefore, in view of the provisions contained in Section
17B of the ID Act, the appellant was paid last drawn wages
amounting ... submitted that since the last drawn wages as provided
8
under Section 17B of the ID Act have been paid during the
period award passed
CWJC No.2406 of 1979(R). The workmen claimed relief
under Section 17B of the I.D. Act in that CWJC. On April ... order passed by the learned Single Judge in
terms of Section 17B of the I.D. Act, the Letters Patent
Appeal was not maintainable because
with the meagre amount of
Rs.650/- awarded to them under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947. It was further submitted that ... this Court directed the appellant to comply with the
requirements of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it is
stated that
makes deposit or payment as
required by sub-section (1), sub-section (2), or sub-
section (2A) no decree or order for delivery of possession ... date the Amendment Act came into force, then neither Section 17A
nor Section 17B would apply and on the arguments of Mr. Mukherjee
the Court
