complainant was dismissed under Section 203 Cr.P.C. by
the ACJM Court, Roorkee under Section 379 , 504 & 506 of IPC, wherein
the report
allowed.
ORDER
The Application number 8A is accepted. The Complaint
under Section 203 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. The file be
consigned to record room
Bpl Limited vs Securities & Exchange Board Of India on 20 June, 2002
ORDER
1
revealed that a criminal case bearing FIR No.422/99 u/s 147 / 447 / 427 / 379 IPC was registered against him. It was also mentioned ... Rajender u/s 203 CrPC, upon which a criminal case bearing FIR No.115/2005 u/s 447 / 427 / 379 IPC was also
late Shri Somnath (criminal complaint No.
45271/2013 Dt 9.1.2013 under Section 307 , 302 , 380 , 217 , 218 ,
452 , 120B of IPC). The applicant however also ... accused as
prayed for. Therefore, present complaint is
hereby dismissed under Section 203 of Cr.P.C. File
be consigned to the record room after
question, the Ld. JMFC dismissed
the complaint under Section 203 of CrPC but that does not mean
that the incident had not taken
Rukmini Chemicals Ltd vs Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 5 December, 2022
Author: Adarsh
Mange Ram Mittal vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax on 18 August, 2006
Equivalent citations
having specified territorial
jurisdiction where offence u/s 135 to 139 has been committed. Otherwise under Cr.P.C . any Court of
Magistrate ... either
making inquiry u/s 202/203 of Cr. P.C. or holding trial, finds that the area in
which offence
Ms. Ravina Khurana, New Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 26 March, 2018
IN THE