Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 98 (0.95 seconds)

Vijay Pal Singh vs State on 18 May, 2012

2011 CC/FIR no. : 295/01 P.S. : Timarpur U/s : 218/34 IPC Case ID No. : 02401R0519742011 IN THE MATTER OF :­ Vijay Pal Singh ... person from legal punishment which is the basic requirement of section 218 IPC. No fault can be found with respect to the seizure
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gulshan Kumar Batra vs . State on 6 October, 2012

whereby order was passed for framing of charge against petitioner/accused u/s 218/219/120(b) Indian Penal Code , 1860 (hereinafter referred ... therefore no loss was caused to the Bhoomidar Rakesh Chopra and Section 218 IPC is not attracted. It was further submitted by him that Section
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Complainant/ vs The State on 20 March, 2012

articles was not prepared. Hence, filed the present complaint u/s 218/149/380/409/506/120­B /34 IPC . 9. Ld. Addl. ACMM during ... without complying legal formalities and the facts clearly disclose the offences u/s 218 / 380 / 409 /506/ 120 ­B/34 IPC against the accused persons
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

H.C. Ilyas Ahmed vs State on 18 May, 2012

2011 CC/FIR no. : 295/01 P.S. : Timarpur U/s : 218/34 IPC Case ID No. : 02401R0490872011 IN THE MATTER OF :­ H.C. Ilyas ... against whom there was no evidence on record, the requirement of section 218 IPC against the petitioner are fulfilled and to this extent
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next