Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1129 (0.06 seconds)

Ram Kumar vs The State on 20 November, 2017

thereafter,   he   executed   the   process   u/s.   83   Cr.P.C   against   accused  Arvind and process  u/s. 83  Cr.P.C is proved ... Section 155(2) Cr.P.C.  In the present case the charge­sheet was filed  u/s. 223 / 224   IPC and  Section
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Okwara on 9 May, 2012

closed. 5. After that statement of accused U/S 313 Cr.PC read with section 281 cr.p.c. was recorded to which accused pleaded ... evidence. 6. The first offence, with which accused was charged was section 224 IPC The said section talks about punishment
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Deepak Lochab on 15 April, 2014

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 224 Indian Penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC ). State v. Deepak Lochab ... Section 207 Cr.P.C. were complied with after appearance of the accused. After hearing arguments, a Notice for the offence under Section 224 IPC
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sahil on 30 January, 2017

State Vs. Sahil FIR No.: 1269/15 PS: Rajouri Garden U/S: 224 IPC Unique Case ID No. :69033/2016 Date ... charge sheet were supplied to accused. After compliance of provisions U/s 207 Cr.P.C . the charges were framed against FIR No.1269
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Ranjit Singh Kandola And Anr. on 22 December, 2017

facts and circumstance statement of accused Ranjit Singh  recorded  u/s 313  Cr.PC and the line of defence taken by  him   in   the   cross ... prosecution   witnesses  appears   to   be   very   relevant.   In   his   statement   u/s   313  Cr.PC   accused   Ranjit   Singh   stated   that   while   he   was  being   brought
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next