that the employer has violated
the mandatory provisions of section 81 of the ID Rules, 1966. Not
only this, the employer has not included ... section 25F , 25G , 25H of ID Act
and Rule 81 of ID Rules. The employer has also violated the
provisions of Section
M/S Deutsche Lufthansa Ag vs Mr. Nayan Pahwa & Ors. on 6 August, 2024
prescribed under Rule 81 of the Rules of 1966.
9.2 Similarly, the principle of seniority
(last come, first go) under Section 25G was also ... learned Labour
Court with regard to h Section 25F and/or Section
25G and/or Rule 81, cannot be faulted.
12. As last contention
1987 and without complying with the
mandatory provisions of Section 25F and 25G of the
::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2017 ... 4813.08.jud 3
Act read with Rule 81 of the Industrial Disputes
(Bombay) Rules, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Rules
with effect from 3.2.2000 without following the procedure
under Section 25G as well as Rule 81. The order dated 3.2.2000 was
stayed by the Labour
there is a clear violation of
Section 25D of the Act as well as Rule 81 of the Rules. It was also
noticed by learned ... clearly in violation of Section 25F , 25G and 25H of the I.D. Act as
well as Rule 81 has also been violated and, therefore
compliance of the provisions
of Sections 25G and 25H of the Act. The workman has placed
reliance on Rules 81 and 82 of the Rules ... there is no violation of Rule 81 of the
Rules. Hence, as a sequel, the provision of section 25G of the
I.D.Act will
view of Rule 81 of the
Industrial Disputes (Gujarat) Rules, 1966 (for short 'the
rules') which reads as under.
"81. Maintenance ... violation
of any provisions of Section 25G or 25H of the ID Act. The
provision of Rule 81 will not be attracted in the present
record to indicate that provisions of
Section 25G of the ' ID Act ' or Rule 81 of the Rules framed
thereunder are violated ... respondent has committed
breach of Sections 25F and 25G of the ' ID Act ' and Rule 81
of the Rules framed thereunder and, therefore
record to indicate that provisions of
Section 25G of the ' ID Act ' or Rule 81 of the Rules framed
thereunder are violated ... respondent has committed
breach of Sections 25F and 25G of the ' ID Act ' and Rule 81
of the Rules framed thereunder and, therefore
