Search Results Page

Search Results

61 - 70 of 3491 (1.08 seconds)

Hissaria Brothers vs Joint Cit on 17 August, 2001

addition under section 68 is not tenable, then penalty under section 271D is leviable because there is violation of section 269SS if cash credit ... held to be income of assessee under section 68 then section 269SS will not operate and in turn, no penalty leviable under section 271D
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 19 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Navin Kumar vs Jt. Cit on 17 November, 2005

Bhatinda, for imposition of penalty under section 271D of the Act. Accordingly, notices under section 274 read with section 271D of the Act for the assessment ... section 271D or section 276DD unconstitutional on the ground that the provisions are draconian or expropriatory. The object of introducing section 269SS is to ensure
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Amritsar Cites 31 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
Previous   3 4 5 6 7   8 9 10 11 12 Next