Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 91 (1.89 seconds)

Sneh Finance & Investment, Pune vs Assessee

also noticed violation of the provisions of section 269SS of the Act and accordingly penalties under section 271D have been levied, which are subject-matter ... given discretion to the department u/s 273B of the Act, not to levy u/s 271D of the Act. Thus, for availing the benefit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahabal S. Shetty, Dombivli (W) vs Assessee

without reasonable cause, in violation of provision of section 269SS and hence levied penalty u/s 271D . Similarly the AO also levied penalty ... Constitution, challenging the constitutional validity of section 269SS and section 271D . The Hon'ble Court held that the provision is enacted to crumb ramped
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Home Developers (P) Ltd, New Delhi vs Assessee

defaults have taken place within the meanings of section 269SS read with Section 271D and section 269T read with section 271E of the Income ... 269SS are as per below; Default as committed u/s 269SS r.w. Sec. 271D SN Narration & Reference Amount of default 1 Cash loan
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J.A. Cotton Mills (P) Ltd., Kolkata vs Assessee

same violates the provisions of section 269SS and 269T of the Act attracting penalty under section 271D and 271E of the Act. As the case ... clause (b) of sub- section (1) of section 271, section 271A, section 271B, section 271BB, section 271C, section 271D, section 271E, clause (c) or clause
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Parag A. Doshi, Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax

provisions of sections 271 and 271E . Looking from the background which gave rise to incorporation of sections 269SS , 269T , 271D and 271E , the Legislature ... examining the violation of provisions of section 269SS and consequent levy of penalty u/s 271D under the IT ACT,1961 and the findings
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rupen Das, Siliguri vs Department Of Income Tax

violation of section 269SS, Assessing Officer imposed penalty upon assessee under section 271D - Tribunal found that there was business exigency forcing assessee to take cash ... acceptance of deposit in violation of section 269SS and imposed penalty upon assessee under section 271D - Tribunal deleted penalty holding that there was no evidence
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

N S S Karayogam, Alappuzha vs Assessee

record. We have carefully gone through the provisions of section 269SS and sec. 271D of the IT Act which read as under: "269SS ... section 271 , section 271A , 61 [ section 271AA ,] section 271B 61 [, section 271BA ], 62[ section 271BB ,] section 271C , 63 [ section 271CA ,] section 271D , section 271E
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Cochin Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next