that Schedule. [Rep. by the Constitution (Thirty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1975 , section 5 (w.e.f . 26. 4. 1975 ).] [ Editorial comment -The Constitution (Thirty-Fifth ... adjudicate on the matters of section 302 , section 307 and section 392 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The contention
defined; (b) in Part I of the Schedule under
Indian Penal Code the word offence under section
477A relating to falsification of accounts should ... Indian Penal
Code or sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 in one group or
category. They were
Section 288 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
288. Negligent conduct with respect to pulling down or repairing buildings.—
Whoever, in pulling down
Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced him to undergo
imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302
IPC together ... Section 27 of the Arms Act, accused Amardeep Singh
Gill was charged under Section 120 read with Section 201
IPC, accused Vikas
said penal provision, that is, Section 377 of the
Indian Penal Code, in Suresh Kumar Koushal and another v. Naz
Foundation and others2 overturning ... India and further to declare Section 377 of
the Indian Penal Code (for short, ― IPC ‖) to be unconstitutional. When
the said
charged with killing the deceased under
section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (For short, IPC ) and with
causing simple injuries ... injured under section 323 IPC.
He was also charged with attempting to murder Brij Raj under
section 307 IPC
under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities
(Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA), Indian Penal Code ( IPC ),
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 , Arms ... Section 3(3) of the
TADA of 1987.
Last charge against Nalini (A-1) is under Section
4(1) TADA read with Section 34 IPC
Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, section 354(3) -If
section 302 , Penal Code, is constitutional, whether the
sentencing procedure provided in section ... HEADNOTE:
Upholding the constitutionality of section 302 , Penal
Code, and section 354 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Code. the Court.
^
HELD: Per majority
Charge under s. 304 read with s. 34 of the
Indian Penal Code against two persons-Acquittal of one-
Omission to frame alternative charge ... punishable under
section 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 34 of
the Indian Penal Code...........".
An exactly similar charge
Sections 120B, 418, 415 and 420 read with Section 34
Indian Penal Code, the respondents moved the High Court for
quashing of complaint ... deception within the meaning of this section.
The Complaint is also said to be under Section 418
I.P.C. which reads as below
