Mohd Abeed S/O Abdul Bari vs The State Of Karnataka Through ... on 26 June, 2013
Mohd Abeed S/O Abdul Bari vs The State Of Karnataka Through ... on 26 June
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1521 (2.18 seconds)Mallikarjun @ Malik S/O Ramu Katake vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Mallikarjun @ Malik S/O Ramu Katake vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Mahibbob Pasha @ Shahn @ Vekeel vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Mahibbob Pasha @ Shahn @ Vekeel vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Author: Ravi
Raffiuddin vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Raffiuddin vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Author: Ravi Malimath
Bench: Ravi
Muneer Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Muneer Ahmed vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2013
Author: Ravi Malimath
Bench
With Sections 292/34 Of The Indian Penal ... vs In Re : Ranadhir Roy on 11 August, 2022
With Sections 292/34 Of The Indian Penal ... vs In Re : Ranadhir Roy on 11 August, 2022
Author: Debangsu Basak
Bench: Debangsu Basak ... dated 03.05.2022 under
Sections 66E / 67 / 67A of the Information Technology Act read
with Sections 292 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code
Emperor vs Abdulali Sharfali on 9 February, 1909
Court. Skipping the intermediate sections, read Sections 289 and 292 together. The accused is asked whether he intends to adduce evidence, if he says that ... straight for ward construction to put upon the sections. The only alternative is to read Section 292 as wholly independent of Section 239 . Bat then
State vs . Mahender & Ors. on 26 August, 2013
Indian
Penal Code , 1860 and Section 7 (1) (b) of The Cinematograph Act, 1952 and under
Section 292 (2) (c) of The Indian Penal Code ... Section 7 (1)
(b) of The Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the owner of the Lokesh Cinema for offences
under Section 292
Raj Kapoor And Ors vs State And Others on 26 October, 1979
criminal Court's jurisdiction to try for
offences under Sections 292 / 293 I.P.C.
HEADNOTE:
Pursuant to the complaint filed by the second ... respondent against the appellants under sections 292/293
read with section 34 of the Penal Code for alleged punitive
prurience moral depravity and shocking erosion
Samaresh Bose And Anr vs Amal Mitra And Anr on 24 September, 1985
meaning of the
section, as the word 'obscene' appearing in the section has
not been defined in the Section or in any provision ... said
Section. This Court upheld the constitutional validity of
the Section and the question of validity of the said section
is, therefore, no longer open