powers under Section 297(1)(k), read with sub-section (2) of Section 297 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. A conjoint perusal ... Section 1 . A conjoint reading of Section 1 and sub-section (2) of Section 297 amply makes it clear that the State Government has been
Section 297 in Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018
297. Transitional provision in regard to elections.
(1) The first ordinary elections to the Gram Panchayats, Mandal ... prior to the date of their constitution as such in terms of section 4 of the Act: Provided that such elected bodies under sub-section
Nagar Nigam Gorakhpur Thru Nagar Ayukt vs Suresh Pandey And 2 Others on 12 September
passed by learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh, summoning the petitioners under
Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short the 'Act').
Briefly ... hopelessly time-barred in view of Section 468(2)(a)
Cr.P.C., because maximum punishment under Section 297 of the Act is only
fine
u/s 115JB of the
Act. The ld. CIT also observed that ld. A.O had not verified the compliance of
provisions of section 297 ... making proper enquiries with respect to the
provisions of Section 297 of the Companies Act and Accounting Standards, namely
force. It was opined that
it was not permissible to construe sections 297(2)(d)(ii ) of the new Act as reviving the right ... reason
was that such a construction of section 297(2)(a )(ii) would be tantamount to giving of
retrospective operation to that section which
head-notes of the said case law: -
Section 271(1)(a) , read with section 297(2)(g) , of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Penalty ... section 271(1) for default
mentioned in section 28(1) of Act of 1922, if his case falls within terms of section
297
head-notes of the said case law: -
Section 271(1)(a), read with section 297(2)(g) , of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Penalty ... section 271(1) for
default mentioned in section 28(1) of Act of 1922, if his case falls within terms of
section 297
The State Of Odisha vs Anup Kumar Senapati on 16 September, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
case this Court discussed the doctrine of double jeopardy and
Section 26 of the General Clauses Act to observe that prosecution under two
different Acts ... cannot abrogate the applicability of the
provisions under Sections 297 , 304 , 304A , 337 and 338 of the
IPC. The offences do not overlap, and therefore
