borne out by illustration (b) appended to
Section 300 .
Clause (b) of Section 299 does not postulate any such knowledge
on the part ... murder. Illustration (c) appended to Section 300 clearly brings out
this point.
Clause (c) of Section 299 and clause (4) of Section 300 both
require
borne out by illustration (b) appended to
Section 300 .
Clause (b) of Section 299 does not postulate any such knowledge
on the part ... murder. Illustration (c) appended to Section 300 clearly brings out
this point.
Clause (c) of Section 299 and clause (4) of Section 300 both
require
violation of Sections 42 and 50 of the Act.
There was no proof of endorsement to the superior officer as mandated in
Section ... prescribed authority. There was also non-compliance with the
requirements of Sections 55 and 57 .
Learned counsel for the State on the other hand submitted
ALLINDCAS 752 (SC), 2003 (8) SCALE 19, 2003 (10) SRJ 299, 2003 (8) ACE 648, 2003 (11) ALLINDCAS ... filed this appeal. Respondents were charged
for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34
of the India Penal Code
CURCRIR 22, 2004 (1) ANDHLT(CRI) 130 SC, 2004 (1) ALD(CRL) 299, (2004) 1 ANDHLT(CRI) 130
Author: Arijit Pasayat
Bench: Doraiswamy Raju , Arijit ... life. Four persons faced trial for
alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code
Ashok Kumar Pandey vs The State Of West Bengal on 18 November, 2003
Equivalent citations
Tulshidas Kanolkar vs The State Of Goa on 27 October, 2003
Equivalent citations: AIR 2004
