allegedly vacated the office of director in terms of Section 283(1) read with Section 299 of the Act. Further, in an extraordinary general meeting ... ceased to be a director in terms of Section 283(l)(i) read with Section 299 and another is his removal by the general body
respondent and without disclosing their interest in terms of Section 299 of the Act, shares were allotted to the 6th respondent and as such they ... incorporated in the said register. It has been held that Sections 299/300 are not applicable in cases of transfer of shares or allotment
Raghavan argued that it is fallacious to apply the provisions of Section 299 / 300 of the Act, as according to him, the provisions of these ... such they are interested directors as envisaged under Section 299 / 300 of the Act. It is contended that if they are interested directors then
were directly interested in the proposed re-transmission, in pursuance of Sections 299 and 300 of the Act they could not participate in discussion ... resolution on the ground that the same attracted the provisions of Section 299 of the Act, as shares were sought to be transmitted to themselves
2003 under Section 237 and CP No. 51/2003 under Section 397/398 read with Section 408 of the Companies Act, 1956 respectively against ... Director, Deptt. of Company Affairs, Kanpur on 3.4.2002.
(d) Violation of Section 299 / 300 of the Companies Act 1956
During the course of inspection
interest in this firm, which is a statutory requirement under section 299 , the 2nd respondent allowed the company to enter into transaction to purchase ... contention that the 2nd respondent had violated the provisions of section 299 and has disqualified himself as a director has no basis.
16. The learned
contract as contemplated by Section 300(1) of the Companies Act nor as an arrangement in terms of Section 299 of the Act. Drawing ... certain relations of directors had been held to have not attracted Section 299 or 300 by the Kerala High Court in Mukkattukara Catholic Company Limited
Disallowance of Rs. 25,25,299/- u/s 43B for non-
payment of Service-tax of Rs. 25,10,511/- and Professional ... first-appeal for 2nd item of disallowance of Rs.
25,25,299/- u/s 43B but did not get any success. Now, the assessee
letter that at the board meeting the implication of Section 299 of the Companies Act should also be discussed. At the board meeting held
premises of the respondents. All these acts are in violation of Sections 299 to 303 of the Companies Act. It is also found that ... forms was filed in February, 1992, showing vacation of office under Section 285(1)(g) of the Companies Act in January, 1992. In between
