Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 351 (2.65 seconds)

Jagan Singh Gahlot vs Rajbala on 16 May, 2020

section (3) of Section 4 was omitted, would not apply to the instant case. Instead, the Old Act, which included subĀ­ section (3) to Section ... children is for their benefit. By Benami Amendment Act, 2016 , Section 3(2) of the Benami Transaction Act, 1988, the statutory presumption, which was rebuttable
Delhi District Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Memo Of Parties vs Smt. Manju on 20 January, 2016

Benami Transaction as defined under Section 2 (a) of the Suit no. 559/08 Raj Kumar Thakkar Vs. Smt. Manju 9/ 16 Benami Transactions (Prohibition ... 3 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 which lays down that no person shall enter into any Benami Transaction. The only exception provided under
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next