Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2723 (1.81 seconds)

Arvind Singh vs State Of Bihar on 26 April, 2001

case of torture in order to attract Section 498A together with ingredients of charge under Section 304B which stands disbelieved by the High Court ... such a conversion. The High Court in introducing Section 302 in place of Section 304B , it has been submitted not only committed a grave error
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 139 - Full Document

Bhoora Singh vs State Of U.P. on 12 July, 1991

were retrospective. There was a deeming clause in Section 113B and under Section 304B indicating that if death of a woman was caused within ... bride burning the conviction cannot be recorded under Section 302 or that the offence under Section 304B was a new offence. 29. However, the matter
Allahabad High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Vineet Suri vs State on 1 August, 2014

Sessions court had convicted the accused under Section 498A IPC, but it had acquitted him under Section 304B IPC. In the appeal preferred ... evidence on which accused No. 1 was charged under Section 498A and Section 304B, the accused can be convicted and sentenced under Section
Delhi High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 3 - H Kohli - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next