Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (1.48 seconds)

Sahadevan vs Nil on 5 July, 2013

trial are proceedings under the Code. Therefore, the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Section 311A has no application ... learned Magistrate that the application under Section 311A Crl.M.C No.3427 of 2013 11 Cr.P.C cannot be entertained at the time
Kerala High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - A Hariprasad - Full Document

State vs . Satish on 27 July, 2018

Magistrate for specimen handwriting and signatures as  Section 311A Cr.P.C. was made effective from 23.06.2006. Therefore, it is clear that ... Sukhram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh  in  Crl. Appeal No. 224/2012  dated 25.07.2016 that   Section   311A   Cr.P.C.   is   prospective   in   nature
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 24 December, 2014

Statement of accused was recorded under Section 313 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. When the accused was briefed on all the incriminating evidence and documents ... having committed an offence and prior to June 23, 2006, when section 311A Cr.P.C was inserted, even a Magistrate could not direct
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next