Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Shiv Shankar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 21 June, 2017 Author: Aditya Kumar

Naveen Singh @ Naveen Prasad Singh vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 21 June, 2017

into consideration. None of the appellants during course of their statement under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. has raised the plea of right ... incumbent upon the accused to project himself as a witness however Section 315 of the Cr.P.C. acknowledges, and, in the facts and circumstances

into consideration. None of the appellants during course of their statement under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. has raised the plea of right ... incumbent upon the accused to project himself as a witness however Section 315 of the Cr.P.C. acknowledges, and, in the facts and circumstances

accused himself and for that his right was properly protected under Section 315 of the Cr.P.C. whereunder accused has got his status duly

trial. This position remains unaltered even after the insertion of Section 315 ... Code and any statement under Section 313 has to be considered in the same way as if Section 315 is not there. 13. The object

accused would have been to avail the opportunity under Section 315 of the Cr.P.C. whereunder Ramdulari ought to have stood

were themselves capable to enter into witness-box as provided under Section 315 of the Cr.P.C. came to explain the same ... finger against the appellants being author of the crime, in terms of section 106 of the Evidence Act, the obligation was over the appellants

also examined three D.Ws. including the appellant in terms of Section 315 of the Cr.P.C. 14. Before coming to ocular evidence first

taken into account in terms of Sub- Section 4 of Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. The aforesaid event, as it appears happens ... accused because of the fact that as per Section 315 of the Cr.P.C. coupled with Article 20 of the Constitution, an accused cannot