been filed under
Sections 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter, referred to as ' Cr.P.C ./Code') seeking setting aside ... Cr.P.C. cannot
be held to be an interlocutory order within the
meaning of sub-section (2) of Section 397 of
Singh and
Rajan @ Rinku u/s 324 / 34 IPC and charge against them was
framed u/s 324 / 34 IPC ... trial
for the offence u/s 319 of the Code, especially when the complainant is a
husband and has initiated criminal proceedings against family
Singh and
Rajan @ Rinku u/s 324 / 34 IPC and charge against them was
framed u/s 324 / 34 IPC ... trial
for the offence u/s 319 of the Code, especially when the complainant is a
husband and has initiated criminal proceedings against family
impugned order allowed
an application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 ( Cr.P.C .), filed by the Respondent, summoning Petitioner ... Section 145(2) of the N.I. Act filed on
27.11.2019 explicitly stated this fact. The Petitioners argue that the
application under Section 319
Mukesh Arora vs The State on 24 January, 2025
IN THE COURT OF SH. ABHISHEK
blatant error in the
case, the complainant moved an application under Section 319
Cr.P.C for impleading the father of the accused ... final arguments, the
complainant moved an application under Section 358 of BNSS,
2023 (old Section 319 Cr.P.C) for impleading one Balwant
(father
fixed for final arguments.
10.) After closing of DE, an application u/s 319 Cr.P.C was moved by the
complainant to implead Mohd ... also pertinent to mention here that although an application
u/s 319 Cr.P.C was moved by the complainant to implead Mohd Tahir
accused but on
moving the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C, respondent no.
1 was made an accused by filing a supplementary charge sheet ... Kuldeep was arrested.
Thereafter respondent no. 1 Arvind was summoned under Section 319
Cr.P.C vide order dated 30.05.2017 passed by the Court
punishable under Section 381 / 34 IPC was framed
against accused Nasir and Pappu, and a charge for the offence under Section
411 IPC was framed ... accused Ashok Sutar was also summoned by the
Court under Section 319 CrPC, though summons could not be served due to
his demise
2016
FIR No. 439/10
PS : Vijay Vihar
u/s. 186/353/332/308/333 IPC
injured police officials along with the role played ... vide order dated 29.04.2019 of Ld. Sessions
Court in terms of Section 319 Cr.PC. It is thus clear that
none of them was arrested
