would fall within clause Eighthly
of Section 300 (sic) of the Indian Penal Code and be
punishable under section 326 thereof. Accordingly, the
conviction recorded ... Section 325 IPC, whereas that of the
remaining appellants from Section 307 / 34 IPC to Section 325 / 34 IPC
sentenced all of the accused
appellants for offence under Section 325 read with Section 34
I.P.C. for two years R.I. with fine ... I.P.C. to offence under Section 323/34 I.P.C. while
maintaining other part of the conviction for offence under
Section 447
U/s 324 IPC : RI for 1 year : - : -
U/s 323/149 IPC : RI for 6 months : - : -
U/s 324 IPC ... under Section 326 IPC
whereas of the remaining appellants under Sections 307 / 149 IPC
to Sections 326 / 149 IPC
Surinder Singh injured did not fall under Section 307 IPC,
instead, it fell under Section 325 IPC Only. Accordingly, after framing ... common
object as envisaged by Section 149 IPC. Instead, Raj Kumar @ Raju
was sentenced under Section 325 IPC to undergo
both the
Courts below for the offences under Section Section 326 of Indian Penal
Code ( IPC -for short). The allegation against the petitioner ... conviction was altered to one from Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC
and Section 325 IPC to one under Section
offence under Sections 307 read with
Section 34 IPC, 326 read with Section 34 IPC, 325 read with Section 34
IPC ... under Section 302 IPC. Therefore,
on the same analogy, the offence will mitigate from Section 307 IPC to
Section 308 IPC
Sections 148 , 304-II read with
Section 149 IPC, whereas, the accused could be convicted only for the
offences under Sections 324 / 325 ... years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- under Section 325 read with Section 149
IPC. All the accused are sentenced to undergo
jurisdiction, that the petitioner is guilty of offence under Section 325
IPC was accepted by the State, as no Special Leave Petition ... Respondent was
convicted under Section 325 / 323 / 149 and 324 / 323 / 149 and
under Section 148 IPC. He has actually undergone the
imprisonment
each;
ii) Karamjit Singh and Dharamjit Singh
appellants were convicted under
Section 325 IPC whereas the remaining
appellants under Sections 325 / 149 IPC ... Dharamjit
Singh, who were convicted for the substantive offence under Section
325 IPC have already undergone a period of one year four months
Bhupati Barik, and thereby committed an
offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, and within the cognizance
of this court.
Secondly, That ... said act, and thereby
committed an offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, and within
cognizance of this court.
Thirdly, That
