Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 5118 (3.52 seconds)

State vs Keshav on 18 September, 2024

offence punishable under Section 411 IPC. However, in view of conviction of the accused under Section 392 IPC with regard to the same ... offence punishable under Section 392 IPC. The prosecution has failed to prove the necessary ingredient of Section 328 IPC. Therefore, accused is acquitted
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Amit Sharma on 28 February, 2024

being tried. Section 354B of the Indian Penal Code is not a lesser offence of Sections 376 / 511 of the Indian Penal Code. Therefore ... appellant under Section 354B of the Indian Penal Code taking aid of Sub- Section 4 of Section 222 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Chandeshwar @ Sunil on 28 September, 2024

complainant and the circumstances, offences under sections 328 / 379 / 34 of Indian Penal code, 1860 was made out and Head Constable Mohd. Naseem Khan ... persons for their having committed offences punishable under Sections 328 / 379 / 34 of Indian Penal Code. Further, the charge was framed against the accused Arjun
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Naeem on 27 April, 2024

sheet filed under Sections 328 / 379 / 411 / 34 IPC Charges framed against accused 328/34 IPC , 379/34 IPC & Naeem, Irfan ... offences punishable under Section 328 / 34 IPC, Sec. 379 / 34 IPC & Sec. 411 / 34 IPC against accused persons namely Naeem
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Shabbhu Razak on 28 October, 2024

After investigation, charge sheet was filed against accused Shabbhu Razak u/s 328 IPC and after filing of charge sheet, cognizance of offence ... against the accused. CHARGE 3. Charge for the offence punishable u/s 328 IPC was framed against accused Shabbhu Razak by Ld. Predecessor
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Arjun Singh @ Parth Devnath on 9 April, 2024

complainant and the circumstances, offences under sections 328 / 379 / 34 of Indian Penal code, 1860 was made out and after registration of FIR, further investigation ... offenders revealed commission of offences punishable under section 328 / 379 / 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 16. It is, therefore, prayed that cognizance
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Arjun Singh @ Parth Devnath on 9 April, 2024

complainant and the circumstances, offences under sections 328 / 379 / 34 of Indian Penal code, 1860 was made out and Head Constable Promod Kumar ... offenders revealed commission of offences punishable under section 328 / 379 / 411 / 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 13. It is, therefore, prayed that cognizance
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next