section (3) of section 376 or section 376AB or section 376DA or section 376DB of the Indian Penal Code ... section (3) of section 376 or section 376AB or section 376DA or section 376DB of the Indian Penal Code
that Schedule. [Rep. by the Constitution (Thirty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1975 , section 5 (w.e.f . 26. 4. 1975 ).] [ Editorial comment -The Constitution (Thirty ... matters of section 302 , section 307 and section 392 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code
said penal provision, that is, Section 377 of the
Indian Penal Code, in Suresh Kumar Koushal and another v. Naz
Foundation and others2 ... India and further to declare Section 377 of
the Indian Penal Code (for short, ― IPC ‖) to be unconstitutional. When
property as provided in sub-section (2) of Section 212 or in sub-section (1) of Section 219, is accused ... convicted of, offences under Sections 225 and 333 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). (b) A commits house-breaking
sentenced
to death for offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code.
Accordingly, the convicts to be hanged by neck till they ... such
convict;
(i) for the offence under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC I award
the punishment
read with 34 of the
Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( IPC ). He was serving as Director of
Technical Education in the State ... believe’ in Section 41 Cr.P.C. had to be read in the light of Section
26 IPC and judgments
them under Section 330 , 323 / 34 and 304
(2) Indian Penal Code. Referring to paragraph
14 of the order, Mr. Tulsi pointed ... framed
against the accused persons under Section 330
Indian Penal Code.
37. The three appeals filed by Ms. Indu Jain and
the State
Digitally signed by
SUBHASH CHANDER
Date: 2018.03.09
the Indian Penal Code
D.2 Gian Kaur’s case – The question ... Reason:
unconstitutionality of Section 306 of
2
the Indian Penal Code
D.3 The approach in Aruna Shanbaug qua 30
Passive Euthanasia
Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act ) and the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( IPC ).
Although the petitioner was not named ... Section 167(2) CrPC the imprisonment should be for a clear period of
10 years or more.”
This is factually incorrect, inasmuch as Section
retained, appellant No.1 was summoned under
Section 498A and Section 323 IPC. Appellants 2 to 5 were not
summoned ... people all across India were arrested
under Section 498A , Indian Penal Code. The Report
further shows that approximately a quarter of those
arrested
