IPC to be
made out, but the offence definitely falls one under Section 332 of IPC
instead of Section 333 ... Section 332 and 3 years of R.I. for the offence under Section 324 of
IPC. The sentence under Section 324 of IPC
offences punishable under Sections 147 , 323 , 333 , 342 , 353 and 506 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, they are disposed ... Section 167(2)(a)(ii) of the Code, since one of the offences alleged against the applicants is under Section 333 of the Indian Penal
past, therefore, it is not a
case under Section 333 of IPC.
(ii) The independent witnesses have not supported version
of the complainant ... previous act during duty is offence punishable under Section
333 of IPC for which the trial court convicted the appellant and
his conviction
Indian Penal - Rs.400/- 1 month RI
Code
326/34 Indian 5 Years Rs.500/- 1 month RI
Penal Code
333/34 Indian 5 Years ... therefore, he
would submit that offence under Section 324 / 34 of the IPC and
Section 333/ 34 are not made out against
Indian Penal - Rs.400/- 1 month RI
Code
326/34 Indian 5 Years Rs.500/- 1 month RI
Penal Code
333/34 Indian 5 Years ... therefore, he
would submit that offence under Section 324 / 34 of the IPC and
Section 333/ 34 are not made out against
payment of fine, 2
U/S 332/149 of IPC months R.I.)
U/S 353/149 of IPC ... U/S 332/149 of IPC default 2 months R.I.)
U/S 353/149 of IPC
payment of fine, 2
U/S 332/149 of IPC months R.I.)
U/S 353/149 of IPC ... U/S 332/149 of IPC default 2 months R.I.)
U/S 353/149 of IPC
charges under Sections 148 , 333 read with
Section 149 , 307 read with Section 149 and Section 353 of IPC
were framed against ... charges under
Sections 148 , 333 read with Section 149 , 307 read with Section
149 , 353 & Section 392 of IPC framed against
payment of fine, 2
U/S 332/149 of IPC months R.I.)
U/S 353/149 of IPC ... U/S 332/149 of IPC default 2 months R.I.)
U/S 353/149 of IPC
2013 convicting the accused/appellant under Sections 353 ,
2
333 & 307 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC ... incident in this case
falls in the description under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code. It is
found that, though in inadvertent manner