profession".
In section-2, sub- sec.24 clause (vb) was inserted which meant that
18
ITA Nos. 553, 355, 554/H/07 & 1145 ... u/s 80IB cannot be deducted from the profit
of business eligible for deduction u/s 80HHC . Accordingly, we direct
26
ITA Nos. 553, 355
assessee u/sec.80IA of the Act. However since the
assessee has made a claim of deduction u/sec.80IA ... State Government/Local
Authority, besides making addition of Rs.32,30,355/-
u/sec.40A(3) of the Act and determined the total income
assessee u/sec.80IA of the Act. However since the
assessee has made a claim of deduction u/sec.80IA ... State Government/Local
Authority, besides making addition of Rs.32,30,355/-
u/sec.40A(3) of the Act and determined the total income
assessee u/sec.80IA of the Act. However since the
assessee has made a claim of deduction u/sec.80IA ... State Government/Local
Authority, besides making addition of Rs.32,30,355/-
u/sec.40A(3) of the Act and determined the total income
assessee u/sec.80IA of the Act. However since the
assessee has made a claim of deduction u/sec.80IA ... State Government/Local
Authority, besides making addition of Rs.32,30,355/-
u/sec.40A(3) of the Act and determined the total income
Section 13 and therefore not
eligible for exemption u/s. 11 . In the order u/s. 154 , AO repeated the
ITA Nos. 355 ... adjudicate on the issue of violation of Sec.13 .
ITA Nos. 355 & 356/Hyd/2014
:- 4 -: Shadan Educational Society
5.3. The cancellation of registration
huge losses amounting to Rs. 1,21,91,355 was accepted by the Revenue under Section 143(l)(a) vide his order dated
case of Nagesh knitwear Pvt. Ltd., 355 ITR 135
observed that the Explanation2 to section 263 inserted by Finance
virtue of amendment to Section 201(1) , wherein the
proviso was inserted, Ld.CIT(A) has given relief as no demand ... Cola
Beverage (P.) Ltd. Vs. CIT [163 Taxman 355 (SC)/ [2007] 293 ITR
226 (SC)], demand u/s. 201(1) cannot be raised and certainly
Acit, Circle-2(1), Hyderabad vs Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy, Kadapa on 12 February
