Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
376. Punishment for rape.—
(1) Whoever, except in the cases provided for in sub-section (2), commits
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30433 (7.35 seconds)Madan Gopal Kakkad vs Naval Dubey And Anr on 29 April, 1992
376 IPC or under s. 376 read with s. 511 IPC but
only one under s. 354 IPC ... constituting an offence
within the ambit of Section 375, punishable under Section
376 IPC are made out, alternatively a hesitant plea is made
Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 1 September, 2015
registered and charge
under Section 506(2) of Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) was framed in the year
2001. The appellant was admitted ... year 2001 only under Section 506(2) of IPC.
Insofar as charge under Section 376 of IPC is concerned
Anurag Soni vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 9 April, 2019
certain decisions of this Court on
Section 375 of the IPC, Section 90 of the IPC and on consent on
misconception ... clause (e) or clause (g) of sub
section (2) of Section 376 of the Indian Penal
Code (45 of 1860), where sexual intercourse
Tarkeshwar Sahu vs State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) on 29 September, 2006
Appellant was found guilty for the offence punishable
under Sections 376 / 511 of Indian Penal Code and was
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven ... modesty of a woman/girl
under Sections 376 , 366 and 354 of the Indian Penal
Code. This exercise was undertaken to clearly spell out
ambit
Ankush Maruti Shinde . vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 March, 2019
Indian Penal Code ,
13
Sections 396 , 397 r.w. 395 and Sec. 398 of Indian
Penal Code.
2. The offence punishable under section ... Indian Penal Code is proved. It includes offences
punishable under sections 395 and 398 of Indian
Penal Code, so no separate punishments are given
The State Of Karnataka vs Krishnappa on 30 March, 2000
further undergo 6 months R.I. for the offence under Section 376 IPC it was directed that in the event of recovery ... While confirming the conviction of the respondent for the offence under Section 376 IPC, the High Court opined:
To conclude the various items
State Of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Jawnmal Gandhi on 11 September, 1997
Sessions Judge, Satara for offences under Section 376
Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) and Section 57 of the Bombay
Children Act, 1948 for having ... 42nd report on
Indian Penal Code submitted in June 1971 suggested
amendments to Sections 375 and 376 IPC, expanding the
definition of rape
Sakshi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 26 May, 2004
well as the implementation of the provisions of Indian Penal Code namely Sections 377 , 375 / 376 and 354 by the respondent authorities. The existing trend ... section (2) of Section 376 and Sections 376A to 376D were inserted by Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983 but Sub-section (2) of Section 376
State Of Rajasthan vs Biram Lal on 13 April, 2005
conviction of the
respondent under Section 450 IPC, acquitted him of the charge under Section 376
IPC. The sentence under Section ... trial court had found the respondent guilty of the offence
under Section 376 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for
seven