petitioners is offences punishable under Sections 384 , 406 , 420 read with Section 120-B IPC. The complaint so filed was sent for investigation ... Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed and the FIR No.257/2014, registered at Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur for the offences under Section 384
complainant Sohan Lal, therefore, no case for offence under Section 384 I.P.C. was made out against the accused petitioners as the essence ... therefore, it has been prayed that charge for offence under Section 384 I.P.C. be quashed.
5. I have heard both the perused
been made out for proceeding against the
appellant under Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code. In
that view of the matter, there was absolutely ... Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
17. For the reasons aforementioned, while quashing
the charge framed under Section 384 of the Indian Penal
investigation had filed challan Under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. for offences Under Section 365 and 384 IPC. The matter was being ... Sessions, which framed charges Under Section 364-A r/w 120-B, Section 365 and Section 384 IPC.
4. Prosecution version was disclosed
revision petition under Section 397
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as ' Cr.P.C .')
read with Section 401 ... Indian Penal Code, 1860
(hereinafter referred as ' IPC ').
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no
offence under Section 384
Secondly, the ingredients of offence under Section 458 IPC is not made out. Section 443 IPC defines lurking house-trespass ... framing the charge for offence under Section 484 IPC rather than for offence under Section 451 IPC.
Even if the stamp
proceedings have been kept pending for trial of offence
under Section 384 IPC. The accused-petitioner is a young boy of
19 years ... charge under section 406 IPC on the basis of compromise and
trial has been kept pending for offence under Section 384 IPC
petitioners that for an offence to be made out under Section 384 IPC, it is to be shown firstly; that the accused intentionally ... reading of FIR, it is found that offence under Section 384 IPC is not disclosed even prima facie as it is not even
accused Jamal under Section 365 , IPC and the accused Soraj and Ladu under Section 365 / 109 IPC and sentenced each ... however, held the appellants guilty under Section 365 or 365/109 and, accused Jarnal further under Section 384 , IPC. They were consequently convicted
Section 154 (3) Cr.P.C. by the
concerned Dy. S.P. on which FIR No. 150/2010 under Section 420
and 384 IPC ... treated as cheating as defined in Section 415 of IPC and
the ingredient of Section 384 IPC are also not available
