Section 391 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 391 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
391. Dacoity.—
When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 5400 (1.88 seconds)Allaudin & Ors. vs State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 4 February, 2016
Indian Penal Code , 1860, deals with offences against
property. Sections 378 to 382 IPC relate to theft, Sections ... Penal Code .
44. So far as the plea of false implication being taken by the
appellants in their statements under Section 313
State vs Javed Khan on 18 July, 2024
prosecuted for
offence punishable under Section 395 of 'The Indian Penal Code ,
1860' (In short ' IPC ... commission of dacoity. Thus, he is
prosecuted for committing offence under Section 412 IPC.
3. It is further case of the prosecution
State vs . Devender Dass on 28 November, 2014
investigation, chargesheet was filed in the Court.
11. After compliance of section 207 Cr.P.C., the case was committed
to the Court of Sessions ... U/s 304II
State V/s Devender Dass ("Convicted") Page 32 of 44
FIR No. 391/12; U/s 302 IPC
Munda @ Satya Narain Choube And Anr. vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 July, 1998
under Section 396 Indian Penal Code, the offence under Section 394 would be minor offence to Section 396 , Indian Penal Code ... life.
with Section 392 , Indian Penal Code.
Under Section 302 read with Section 34 , Imprisonment for life.
Indian Penal Code .
These two sentences
Gurudayal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 27 March, 2026
circumstances mentioned in the section.
Therefore, it is not correct to acquit an accused of the charge
under Section 307 IPC merely ... proving the offence under this Section and the term
"hurt" has been defined in Section 319 of IPC which means
P.Vankat Rao vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 27 March, 2026
circumstances mentioned in the section.
Therefore, it is not correct to acquit an accused of the charge
under Section 307 IPC merely ... proving the offence under this Section and the term
"hurt" has been defined in Section 319 of IPC which means
Mohammad Hasnen vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 27 March, 2026
circumstances mentioned in the section.
Therefore, it is not correct to acquit an accused of the charge
under Section 307 IPC merely ... proving the offence under this Section and the term
"hurt" has been defined in Section 319 of IPC which means
Chandan Parija vs State Of Orissa .... Opp. Party on 16 November, 2021
conviction was under Section
392 read with Section 397 of the Code. While
framing charges by applying Section 397 of the
Code, this aspect should ... charge under Section - 392 Sections 392 ,
394 or 395, as the case may be, read with Section 397 of the Code
should be framed
Unknown vs Counsel For on 12 November, 2015
proceedings are barred by Section 300 Cr.P.C, for the reason even in
the earlier offence mentioned as 395 IPC ... return for the
prosecution under Section 52 of the Act and also under Section 177 of IPC
he takes one trial