Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
392. Punishment for robbery.—
Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13608 (3.60 seconds)State Of H.P vs Nirmala Devi on 10 April, 2017
faced trial for offence covered by Sections 328, 392, 397
read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) alongwith co-accused ... sentence of imprisonment is an
essential sentence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. To this
sentence a fine may be added and, under
Kaziman Gurung vs State Of Sikkim on 26 July, 2017
Pradhan, J
1. A Trial of the offences under Section 307 and
Section 392 IPC conducted by the Learned Session Judge, East
Sikkim ... which
FIR number 182/2013 dated 23.07.2013 under Section 307, Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter the IPC) was registered at 2010 hrs
against
Amarjit Singh vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 3 November, 2009
2001 has been registered under Sections 394 / 34
of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC ... IPC is not individual in the sense
as it is under Section 397 of the IPC; Section 397 of the IPC
Rupinder Singh @ Pinda Son Of Onkar Singh ... vs State Of Punjab on 10 October, 2013
whose statement was recorded.
He then added offence under Section 392 IPC, on the basis of
statement of Baljit Singh @ Ghug ... that they had committed offences
punishable under Sections 302 / 392 / 341 read with Section 34 IPC.
On presentation of police report, copies
State Of Maharashtra vs Mahipal Singh Satyanarayan Singh on 11 March, 1996
charges on four counts namely under sections 392 r/w 34 IPC , 392 r/w section 397 IPC ... respondent under section 332 / 34 IPC is not enhanced, by us but that, under section 392 / 34 IPC, is enhanced
Imran @ Akhlakh vs State on 22 April, 2015
IPC r/w Section 392 IPC, 392/34 IPC and 397 IPC does not call
for interference ... Section 392
IPC, 392/34 and 397 IPC is upheld. However, conviction u/s 25 and
27 Arms
State vs . 1). Gulshan Taneja on 28 January, 2016
were sent to face trial for the
offence punishable U/s 302/392/120B IPC and accused Gulshan Taneja
was also sent ... punishable u/s 397 IPC against accused Gulshan Taneja and separate
charge in respect of offences punishable U/s 302/392
State Of H.P. vs Nirmala Devi on 10 April, 2017
faced trial for offence covered by Sections 328, 392,
397 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) alongwith
co-accused ... sentence of
imprisonment is an essential sentence under
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. To
this sentence a fine may be added and,
under
State Of U.P. vs Mukhtar Ansari on 23 September, 2022
Section 307 IPC;
12. 080 of 1999, under Sections 448 and 506 IPC;
13. Crime No.0167 of 1999, under Section ... 0109 of 1999, under Section 394 IPC;
16. Crime No.01002 of 1998, under Sections 392 and 411 IPC lodged